Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. American Medical Association. Accessed 4 September Revue Scientifique et Technique. Microbiological Reviews. Sudhoffs Archiv in German. Archived from the original on 15 February Retrieved 12 March Smallpox: the fight to eradicate a global scourge.
Berkeley: University of California Press. Archived from the original on 11 December Retrieved 3 January McNeil 26 April Get the Shots, Faith Leaders Say". The New York Times. Retrieved 29 April A Structural Biologist's Perspective". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. Smallpox Fact Sheet. Archived from the original PDF on 2 January Retrieved 2 January Recommendations and Reports. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 20 October Retrieved 29 September Retrieved 8 January Retrieved 28 July Retrieved 1 March Pediatric Annals.
How orthodox protestant parents decide on the vaccination of their children: a qualitative study
Retrieved 24 March Institute For Safe Medication Practices. Retrieved 15 March Vaccine Safety CDC". The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. Retrieved 22 March International Journal of Infectious Diseases. Immunological Bioinformatics. MIT Press. XXV, C. A History of Immunology 2nd ed. Academic Press. Letters on the English. Washington, DC: Smithsonian. Public Health Law Research. Retrieved 19 November The New England Journal of Medicine. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial". Archives of Internal Medicine.
Biological Sciences. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. The Truth about Vaccines. Gibson Square. Southern Medical Journal. A broken trust: lessons from the vaccine—autism wars. PLoS Biol.
Everything You Need to Know About Vaccinations
PMC Retrieved 26 April Retrieved 10 June Scientific American. Bibcode : SciAm. Bibcode : PLoSO.. Expert Review of Vaccines. Retrieved 28 March Financing Vaccines in the 21st Century.
Retrieved 7 September Retrieved 2 December Infectious disease and microbiology. Cholera Diphtheria Leprosy Syphilis Tuberculosis. Aspergillosis Candidiasis Tinea. Amoebic dysentery Hookworm Malaria Schistosomiasis. Lice Scabies. Adjuvants List of vaccine ingredients Mathematical modelling Timeline Trials. Secretary of Health and Human Services Alternative vaccination schedule. Public health. Auxology Biological hazard Chief Medical Officer Cultural competence Deviance Environmental health Euthenics Genomics Globalization and disease Health economics Health literacy Health policy Health system Health care reform Public health law Maternal health Medical anthropology Medical sociology Mental health Pharmaceutical policy Public health intervention Public health laboratory Reproductive health Social psychology Sociology of health and illness.
If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. Don't already have an Oxford Academic account? Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Sign In or Create an Account. Sign In. Advanced Search. Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation. Volume Telephone , fax , e-mail anna.
- “09/11/2001 – Ten Years Later”;
- What Vaccines Do Adolescents Need??
- How to Live Dangerously: Why we should all stop worrying, and start living.
Oxford Academic. Google Scholar. Cite Citation. If they came from a non-vaccinating family, they refused vaccination; if they came from a vaccinating family, they agreed to vaccination. You have been given the same values. It was no longer a point of discussion. Those parents who made a deliberate choice considered both to vaccinate and not to vaccinate. Although the man is the head of the family in orthodox Protestantism, in the cases in our study of making a deliberate decision, the decision was mostly made by the two parents after lengthy discussion.
Vaccines given to babies under 1 year old
None of the participants making a deliberate choice discussed the topic with the religious leaders of their churches. Personal religious experiences were sometimes reported to play an important role in their final decisions, however. Many of the parents making a deliberate choice prayed to God to help them with their decision and some reported having received a sign from God. Things were clear for me then.
For both parents who followed tradition and parents who made a deliberate choice, the vaccination decision was made for all children to come. Although some parents reported reconsidering the decision with the birth of every new child, this did not lead to a different decision.
Moreover, all of the parents agreed that the parents are responsible for the vaccination decisions as long as the children live in their homes; the children take on responsibility when they come of age and marry. When the nature of the vaccination decision-making process is considered together with the final outcome regarding participation in the National Immunization Program i. The characteristics of the respondents in each subgroup are summarized in Table 2. The traditionally non-vaccinating parents all belonged to denominations with low vaccination coverage.
They referred to religious doctrine to explain their refusal of vaccination. Man should not interfere with divine providence and man cannot interfere with divine providence because God is almighty. The timing of a medical intervention is of critical importance for them: Preventive measures are not accepted while curative and palliative measures often are.
I believe that if God wants to spare my children from an accident, then He will spare them from it.edutoursport.com/libraries/2020-09-18/2515.php
What is the Vaccine Knowledge Project?
You can simply see that you have nothing to say. We cannot predict what he brings or does not bring upon us. Tetanus post-exposure prophylaxis was typically considered a cure and thus accepted by these parents. Some of the traditional non-vaccinating parents in our study therefore also accepted polio vaccination in the case of an epidemic. When faced with immediate danger, vaccination was no longer considered preventive by them. But there was a real danger then. Apart from their religious objections, the traditionally non-vaccinating parents sometimes had concerns about vaccine safety and particularly about the disease-inducing properties of vaccines, however they reported these concerns were not decisive.